The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has recently made headlines by expressing its strong disapproval of the decision to approve the film Adipurush. This contentious movie has faced scrutiny from the court, which has raised serious questions about the actions of the Board of Film Certification. In the court’s view, portraying characters from the revered Hindu epic, Ramayana, in a mocking and disrespectful manner is a grave mistake that should not have been
The Concerns Raised by the Court
The bench, consisting of Justice Rajesh Singh Chauhan and Justice Sriprakash Singh, voiced its dissatisfaction with the portrayal of the characters from the Ramayana, which are held in high esteem and worshipped by millions of people. They questioned how a film that trivializes the sacred epic could receive certification. The court regarded this as a significant error on the part of the Board of Film Certification.
The Court’s Inquiry
During the third consecutive day of the hearing, the bench directed its queries towards Deputy Solicitor General SB Pandey, who represented the board. The court sought an explanation as to how the film could defend the certificate it had been granted. In response, the Deputy Solicitor General stated that the film had been certified by members of the board who were sensitive to the matter at hand. The court humorously remarked, “Blessed are those who passed it,” implying a level of skepticism towards the decision.
A Wider Issue
Although the court made its observations orally, it brought attention to the larger issue of Hindu Gods and Goddesses being portrayed in a comical manner in recent films. The bench emphasized that if such incidents are allowed to continue without objection, they will become a recurring pattern. The court stressed the importance of addressing and rectifying this trend to preserve the respect and dignity associated with religious sentiments.
The decision to approve the film Adipurush has come under scrutiny by the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court expressed its concern over the depiction of characters from the revered epic Ramayana in a manner that undermines their sacredness. It considered the certification of the film to be a significant mistake on the part of the Board of Film Certification. This case serves as a reminder to protect the sentiments and beliefs associated with religious figures and narratives.
1. Why did the court question the approval of the film Adipurush? The court raised concerns about the depiction of characters from the Ramayana, which are highly revered and worshipped, being shown in a disrespectful manner.
2. Who represented the Board of Film Certification in the court proceedings? Deputy Solicitor General SB Pandey represented the board and provided arguments in defense of the film’s certification.
3. What did the court say about recent films portraying Hindu Gods and Goddesses comically? The court noted that there have been several instances where Hindu Gods and Goddesses have been depicted in a humorous manner in recent films, highlighting a growing trend that needs to be addressed.
4. What message did the court convey by questioning the film’s approval? The court emphasized the need to prevent the trivialization of religious figures and narratives to protect the sentiments and beliefs associated with them.
5. What was the court’s stance on the approval of Adipurush? The court regarded the approval of Adipurush as a significant mistake on the part of the Board of Film Certification, considering the portrayal of the revered characters from the Ramayana as a disrespect to the epic.